BYU Gloves Disappoint
The Gulag returns for the first time in 2011.
Sweet Sweet Lax put us on to a major brand switch Friday night. What is going on in Provo? They have 37 new sponsors every year. Must be taking after the football team and chasing that big money or at least companies that offer the biggest discounts. If we learned one thing from last night’s ridiculous premiere of Spartacus, it’s that everything is for sale. So long STX. Hello, Reebok.
How did Reebok acquire any real estate at a Nike school? BYU has never worn Nike lacrosse uniforms. In fact, we don’t remember a time when they’ve ever worn a brand name uniform. That’s fine. Not every MCLA lacrosse team wears the same brand uniform as their football counterparts. Still, we find it curious that Reebok would secure BYU (the lime green and silver Reebok lacrosse logo is now located in the sponsor section of the BYU website.)
Here is a series of interesting questions.
Did Reebok approach BYU or did BYU approach Reebok?
If Reebok approached BYU, did BYU reach out to Nike lacrosse in hopes of a counter offer?
If BYU approached Reebok, why Reebok? Why not the 19 other lacrosse companies?
What made Reebok special?
And, why did they bail on STX?
Shame on Nike for losing a lacrosse team at a Nike U school to Reebok. However, if BYU did not contact Nike with Reebok’s proposal, shame on BYU’s negotiating skills.
Industry questions asides, we’d like to offer our aesthetic opinion, because it differs so greatly from tastes of SSL writer @ConnorWilsonLAS. Mr. Wilson writes, “BYU kept it simple and didn’t divert far from the basics but that makes sense, since their color scheme is so basic (navy and white), so it works.”
Did they keep it simple? Reebok gloves cannot match the number of customizable zones of a Warrior, Brine, or Maverik glove. So to say they kept it simple implies that they decided against an outlandish glove design when in actuality they had no choice. Reebok gloves feature two zones of customization. They are naturally simple and therefore creatively limiting.
Take a look at Sweet Sweet Lax’s coverage of this season’s NLL gloves. They all look the same. It’s 2011. More than two zones isn’t a luxury. It’s the standard.
Let’s return to Mr. Wilson’s statement. “BYU kept it simple and didn’t divert far from the basics but that makes sense, since their color scheme is so basic (navy and white), so it works.”
Navy and white?
The only white we see is on the palm. Don’t let the way the light is hitting the cuff fool you. That tab is silver too. (And what’s with the spacing of the player number?)
White is not anywhere else on that unit. We see silver though. Are the Cougars trying to make silver happen in 2011, because they were all about it in the fall. Choosing silver over white seems very out of character for the traditionally straight shooting MCLA power. Therefore, we considered the possibility that white wasn’t a color option for Reebok gloves.
Wrong.
Consciously going against school colors? Bailing on STX for Reebok? Bailing on anyone for Reebok anything?
Welcome to the Gulag, BYU.
In other “major companies who have recently entered the lacrosse industry, but have previously made suspect equipment” news, how about this tweet…
Pardon me?
LAS responded.
Probably only turning a $14.73 profit on that cleat. Not ready to mention what was said in our meeting with adidas on Thursday. Similar yet different ideas were discussed.
What a fun day. In summary, BYU’s Reebok jokes are a rain cloud over the entire MCLA’s head and @ConnorWilsonLAS needs to get his fangs back or his eyes checked or both.
Skim milk. Avoid it.











Pingback: Frequent Flyer Miles: SouthEastern Lacrosse Conference - MCLA FAN
Pingback: World Spinner